|
|
 |
August/September
2003 |
Letter to the Editor
Subject: Affiliated Companies: The Danger
of the Intermingled Business
In line with the recent and more famous cases
in the news about insolvencies and the corporate abuses in related
party transactions, I have recently encountered a similar, but
more subtle problem: companies that are affiliated through common
ownership. From a legal and financial standpoint, there was a
clear separation of the entities. One of the companies (my client)
was insolvent, and the other company was solvent. Additionally,
both companies operated in the same industry, had common customers
and suppliers, shared management, and conducted transactions with
each other.
In this situation, the owners of the solvent company were partial
owners of the insolvent company and used their knowledge and position
with the insolvent company to the advantage of the solvent company.
Although management had engaged me as the CRO, the company’s
insolvency required me to shift my fiduciary responsibilities
toward the creditors. Because of this complicated situation, negotiations
with customers and suppliers were strained, as we worked to resolve
the troubled company’s financial crisis. In this process,
we had to unravel the complex commercial relationship of the affiliated
companies without damaging the inherent value of the respective
business. This issue was further complicated by the fact that
common management had abused the sanctity of the legal entities,
overstepping legal constraints and violating the financial covenants
with their lenders.
This engagement emphasized the
importance of professionals maintaining focus on their primary
obligations, while being vigilant for improper conduct. Furthermore,
it emphasized that CRO’s be cognizant, not only to the obvious
issues of related parties, but, to the subtle problems presented
by intermingling of commercial issues and business operations
among affiliated companies.
Mike Marcus
|